Skip to content

Busara

Busara Main Logo
  • Publications
  • Our People
  • Collaborate
  • What’s Happening
    • Blog
    • LinkedIn pulse
    • Videos
    • Press releases
  • Publications
  • Our People
  • Collaborate
  • What’s Happening
    • Blog
    • LinkedIn pulse
    • Videos
    • Press releases
More About Busara
  • Playbook

How to enable youth to participate in agriculture? A playbook for designing youth-inclusive agriculture programs

Read PDF

Kinyera Justin, Amwoma Janeth, Maru Tufa Digafe, Adera Duncan, Ojha Alina, Harrity Rowan

  • June 22, 2026
  • 10:47 am
OAF Playbook web elements_IG Square

SECTOR

Agriculture

PROJECT TYPE

Qualitative research

DOI

Location

Uganda, Ethiopia, and Burundi

BEHAVIORAL THEME

Youth employment
OVERVIEW

This playbook, developed through a partnership between One Acre Fund and Busara, provides practical guidance for designing youth-inclusive agricultural programs in sub-Saharan Africa. Drawing on behavioral science research, qualitative fieldwork, and co-design sessions with more than 260 youth, women, and household heads across Uganda, Ethiopia, and Burundi, it challenges the assumption that young people are uninterested in agriculture and instead highlights the structural, social, and behavioral barriers that shape participation. The playbook offers a segmentation framework and a set of evidence-informed interventions to help practitioners design programs that better support youth engagement in agriculture.

Research Questions

  • Why do many young people choose not to participate in agriculture despite expressing interest in the sector?
  • What behavioral, social, and structural barriers prevent youth engagement in agricultural programs?
  • How do these barriers differ across different groups of young people and between young men and women?
  • What practical interventions can agricultural organizations implement to create more youth-inclusive programs?
  • How can behavioral science and co-design approaches improve the effectiveness of youth-focused agricultural programming?

Methods

The playbook is based on a multi-stage research and design process that included a review of existing evidence, in-depth qualitative research, co-design workshops, and intervention prototyping. The study engaged more than 260 youth, women, and household heads across Uganda, Ethiopia, and Burundi through interviews and focus group discussions. Findings were analyzed using the Social Ecological Model (SEM) to identify barriers at the individual, interpersonal, community, and structural levels, which then informed the development of eight co-designed intervention concepts.

THEMATIC AREAS

Key Findings

  • Young people are not disengaged from agriculture because of a lack of interest, but because agriculture is often perceived as slow, uncertain, and less attractive than alternative livelihoods.
  • Youth are not a homogeneous group and require different program approaches based on their motivations, aspirations, and constraints.
  • Four distinct youth segments emerged from the research: Reluctant Participants, Income Diversifiers, Committed Innovators, and Passive Helpers.
  • Barriers to participation exist at multiple levels, including individual, interpersonal, community, and structural factors.
  • Gender shapes participation across all segments, with young women facing additional barriers related to childcare, household decision-making, and social norms.
  • Effective agricultural programming requires addressing behavioral and social barriers alongside traditional challenges such as land access, finance, markets, and technical knowledge.
  • The research identified eight co-designed interventions aimed at reducing key barriers to youth participation and sustained engagement in agriculture.

Implications for Policy or Development

  • Agricultural programs should move beyond treating youth as a single target group and instead tailor interventions to distinct youth segments.
  • Increasing youth participation requires addressing both behavioral and structural barriers rather than focusing solely on skills training or awareness campaigns.
  • Program design should account for factors such as social identity, perceptions of farming, household power dynamics, childcare responsibilities, access to land, finance, and markets.
  • Gender-responsive approaches are essential to ensure young women can participate meaningfully in agricultural opportunities.
  • Behavioral science and co-design methods provide valuable tools for understanding youth decision-making and developing contextually relevant solutions.
  • Development organizations, funders, and policymakers can use the playbook’s segmentation framework and intervention library to design more effective, inclusive, and scalable agricultural programs for young people.
RELATED CONTENT

Stress and Temporal Discounting: Do Domains Matter?

August 2, 2020

How Soon Is Now? Evidence of Present Bias from Convex Time Budget Experiments

August 2, 2020

Measuring Self-Efficacy, Executive Function and Temporal Discounting in Kenya

August 2, 2020

Risky Choices and Solidarity: Why Experimental Design Matters

August 2, 2020
1 2 3 … 5 Next »
  • Home
  • Publications
  • Our people
  • What’s happening
    • Blog
    • LinkedIn pulse
    • Videos
  • Home
  • Publications
  • Our people
  • What’s happening
    • Blog
    • LinkedIn pulse
    • Videos
Facebook Linkedin Twitter Instagram
  • Collaborate
  • More About Busara
  • Join us
  • Collaborate
  • More About Busara
  • Join us

© 2026 Busara | Privacy Policy

Scroll to Top
Manage Cookies

To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. 

Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}