- Data collection collaborations
Measuring Ethnic Bias: Can Misattribution-Based Tools from Social Psychology Reveal Group Biases that Economics Games Cannot?.
Ashley Blum, Chad Hazlett & Daniel N. Posner
- January 5, 2021
- 8:55 pm
SECTOR
PROJECT TYPE
DOI
Location
BEHAVIORAL THEME
OVERVIEW
Economics games such as the Dictator and Public Goods Games have been widely used to measure ethnic
bias in political science and economics. Yet these tools may fail to measure bias as intended because
they are vulnerable to self-presentational concerns and/or fail to capture bias rooted in more automatic
associative and affective reactions. We examine a set of misattribution-based approaches, adapted from
social psychology, that may sidestep these concerns.
THEMATIC AREAS
Participants in Nairobi, Kenya completed a series of common economics games alongside versions of these misattribution tasks adapted for this setting, each designed to detect bias toward noncoethnics relative to coethnics. Several of the misattribution tasks show clear evidence of (expected) bias, arguably reflecting differences in positive/negative affect and heightened threat perception toward noncoethnics. The Dictator and Public Goods Games, by contrast, are unable to detect any bias in behavior toward noncoethnics versus coethnics. We conclude that researchers of ethnic and other biases may benefit from including misattribution-based procedures in their tool kits to widen the set of biases to which their investigations are sensitive.